Matter Desynchronization,  Page 4 of 4

 

A shielded, internally powered 1 ghz  (1e^+9 cycles per second) oscillator circuit is placed inside the cylinder bore while the radiated output is monitored with a spectrum analyzer or oscilloscope.  The predicted frequency of the radiated signal output from the oscillator should be decreased several orders of magnitude down to approximately 1680 hz, as observed from outside the cylinder, Reductions in magnetic field strength will affect the observed output frequency in an inversely proportional manner. The frequency shift value represents the difference of the rate of time passage within the cylinder compared to the rate of time passage outside the cylinder. In the case of a 2 Tesla field, 1 year outside the cylinder = ~ 53 seconds inside.

     Calculations of the Earth’s gravitational attraction to desynchronized matter will be carried out in the local frame.

If ordinary matter is released from rest above the Earth, the velocity of descent is:

Vo = g To To = 1,2,3... sec

In the case of desynchronized matter,

Vo = g (Tm / n) Tm = 1,2,3... sec

for n = 10^4, Vo is trivial

The distance through which a body falls each second is:

Lo = g T^2 = Vo T

With respect to desynchronized matter, T = Tm / n. Again, gravity seems quite feeble.

Whereas the measure of distance in the local frame is

Lo = Co To, the corresponding separation of space in the desynchronized frame, as calculated in the local frame, is Lo = Co (Tm / n). Hence, distant objects in the local frame are nearby in the desynchronized frame.

While it appears that desynchronized matter is difficult to accelerate (e.g. gravitationally), the reduced distance to potential destinations drastically diminishes the time required to reach them.

For a resonant increase in sample volume, a volume—dependent lifting force would spur inertial acceleration and: Mg/V = dg; d would drop. [14]

References

[0) McGraw—Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology, 1982

[1] Stroke, G., PhD, Head of Elecro—Optics, S.U.N.Y., [0], v7 p689

(2] Feynman, R., et al., The Feynman Lectures on Physics, 1964, v2 Chp32 p12

[3] Pockett, F., Engineer, [0], vS p374

[4) Harrison, W., PhD, Applied Physics, Stanford, [0], v12 p621

[5] Burton, R., Head of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern, [01, vl3 p631

[6) Brienza, H., PhD, United Technologies, [0], vl p81

[7) Keffer, F., Prof. of Physics, Univ. of Pittsburgh, [0], vS p93

[8) Nussbaum, A., et al, Contemporary Optics ~L Scientists and Engineers, 1976, pp333,37l

(9] Encyclopedia Britannica, 1986, Macropedia, “Electricity and Magnetism,” p266

[10] Bottcher, C., Theory of Electric Polarization, 1973, vi pp7l,289

[11] Watson, W., Prof. Emeritus of Physics, Yale, [0], v13 p63

                    [121 Feynman, R., et al, op cit [2], Chpi6 p4, Chp 17 pp2,3

                   [131 Edminister, J., Electrpmagnetjcs, 1979, p166

[141 Adams, L., “Magnetic Force Parallel to the Field,” April 20, 1994, (unpublished)

[15] Kip, A., Electricity and Magnetism, 1962, p200